Carbon Border Adjustment and Emerging-Economy Exporters: Exposure, Measurement Capability and Firm Response
Keywords:
carbon border adjustment, emerging economies, emissions accounting, export competitiveness, small and medium enterprisesAbstract
The European Union's carbon border adjustment mechanism entered its transitional phase in 2023 and its definitive regime begins in 2026, covering cement, iron and steel, aluminium, fertilisers, electricity and hydrogen. Analysis of its consequences for emerging-economy exporters has concentrated on price exposure. This study argues that for such exporters, and for the small and medium enterprises within their supply chains, the binding constraint is not the carbon price but the capability to document embedded emissions at product level. The method is a structured review of research published between 2017 and 2024, combined with a firm-capability analysis that traces how the mechanism's default-value provisions convert a measurement deficit into a price penalty. Three findings follow. Exposure is highly uneven, with many developing economies having more than two per cent of exports and one per cent of production affected, concentrated in a small number of sectors. Emissions measurement is unreliable even among large listed firms, where harmonisation of reporting roughly doubles measured footprints and corporate reports omit about half of total emissions, which makes measurement capability a first-order constraint rather than an administrative detail. And the evidence base underpinning the mechanism is contested: no carbon leakage was detected in European manufacturing under emissions trading, and carbon pricing has generally shown no significant competitiveness effect. The study concludes that the first-order strategic response for exposed firms is investment in emissions accounting rather than abatement, and that a credible domestic carbon price is what converts exposure into actual emission reduction.References
Bellon, M., Dabla-Norris, E., Khalid, S., & Lima, F. (2022). Digitalization to improve tax compliance: Evidence from VAT e-invoicing in Peru. Journal of Public Economics, 210, 104661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104661
Best, R., Burke, P. J., & Jotzo, F. (2020). Carbon pricing efficacy: Cross-country evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics, 77(1), 69-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00436-x
Boute, A. (2024). Accounting for carbon pricing in third countries under the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. World Trade Review, 23(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745624000107
Chu, H. L., Do, N. T., Nguyen, L., Le, L., Ho, Q. A., Dang, K., & Ta, M. A. (2024). The economic impacts of the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on developing countries: The case of Vietnam. Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy, 4(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/FREP-03-2024-0011
Chu, L., Do, T. N., Le, T. H. L., Ho, Q. A., & Dang, K. (2024). Carbon border adjustment mechanism, carbon pricing, and within-sector shifts: A partial equilibrium approach to Vietnam's steel sector. Energy Policy, 193, 114293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114293
Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., & Munnings, C. (2019). Developing guidance for implementing border carbon adjustments: Lessons, cautions, and research needs from the literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey020
Eicke, L., Weko, S., Apergi, M., & Marian, A. (2021). Pulling up the carbon ladder? Decarbonization, dependence, and third-country risks from the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Research & Social Science, 80, 102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102240
European Commission. (n.d.). Carbon border adjustment mechanism. DirectorateGeneral for Taxation and Customs Union.
Halling, A., & Baekgaard, M. (2024). Administrative burden in citizen-state interactions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(2), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad023
Klaassen, L., & Stoll, C. (2021). Harmonizing corporate carbon footprints. Nature Communications, 12, 6149. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26349-x
Kochanova, A., Hasnain, Z., & Larson, B. (2020). Does e-government improve government capacity? Evidence from tax compliance costs, tax revenue, and public procurement competitiveness. The World Bank Economic Review, 34(1), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx024
Lin, B., & Zhao, H. (2024). Threatening the poor? The economic impacts of carbon border adjustment mechanism on developing countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 71, 582-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2024.09.005
Magacho, G., Espagne, E., & Godin, A. (2024). Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: Consequences for developing countries. Climate Policy, 24(2), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2200758
Naegele, H., & Zaklan, A. (2019). Does the EU ETS cause carbon leakage in European manufacturing? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 125-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.11.004
Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, Said, M. Y., & Yanova, M. H. (2024). Carbon pricing policy to support net zero emission: A comparative study of Indonesia, Finland and Sweden. Environmental Policy and Law, 54(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-230047
Okunogbe, O., & Pouliquen, V. (2022). Technology, taxation, and corruption: Evidence from the introduction of electronic tax filing. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(1), 341-372. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200123
Olekanma, O., Rodrigo, L. S., Adu, D. A., & Gahir, B. (2024). Small- and medium-sized enterprises' carbon footprint reduction initiatives as a catalyst for green jobs: A systematic review and comprehensive business strategy agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 6911-6939. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3846
Perdana, S., & Vielle, M. (2022). Making the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries. Energy Policy, 170, 113245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113245
Venmans, F., Ellis, J., & Nachtigall, D. (2020). Carbon pricing and competitiveness: Are they at odds? Climate Policy, 20(9), 1070-1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1805291
Vincent, R. C. (2023). Vertical taxing rights and tax compliance norms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 205, 443-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.11.003
Zhong, J., & Pei, J. (2022). Beggar thy neighbor? On the competitiveness and welfare impacts of the EU's proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Policy, 162, 112802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112802
Zhong, J., & Pei, J. (2024). Carbon border adjustment mechanism: A systematic literature review of the latest developments. Climate Policy, 24(2), 228-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2190074
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nia Nur Pratiwi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0).